Program Requirements

General Program Requirements:
Number of Credits Required to Earn the Degree: 42

Required Courses:

Course List

Code	Title	Credit Hours
Core Courses
Epistemology/Metaphysics Course		3
History of Philosophy Courses		9
Select one course each in Ancient, Kant/Hegel, and 17th/18th Century Philosophy
Values/Ethics Course		3
Electives 1		21
Research Courses		6
PHIL 9994	Preliminary Examination Preparation
PHIL 9998	Pre-Dissertation Research
PHIL 9999	Dissertation Research
Total Credit Hours		42

¹

Of the 21 elective credits, 9 credits may be taken in cognate disciplines, subject to determination by the Director of Graduate Studies.

For a current copy of the Departmental Graduate Handbook, which lists all requirements, email claphilo@temple.edu or call 215-204-1742.

Language Examination: Doctoral students in the program must pass a proficiency examination in a foreign language that is relevant for their dissertation work. The choice of language should be decided in consultation with their advisor. The proficiency exam must be passed before the student completes their second preliminary examination and begins their dissertation research. The language requirement may be waived at the discretion of the advisor and with the approval of the Director of Graduate Studies for doctoral students whose research does not depend on such proficiency.

Logic Examination: All students must demonstrate proficiency in logic. This requirement may be satisfied in two ways: 1. Passing the proficiency examination in logic administered by the Department prior the beginning of the Fall Semester of their first year of studies; 2. Earning in their first year of studies 3 credits in a first order symbolic logic course (this logic course would count toward the 36-credit hours of coursework).

External Coursework: Students must complete 36 credit hours of coursework. 30 of the 36 hours must be taken at Temple University in the Philosophy Department. A maximum of 6 credit hours can be transferred from graduate work at previous institutions or taken at institutions affiliated with the Greater Philadelphia Philosophy Consortium (GPPC institutions with PhD programs in philosophy are the University of Pennsylvania and Villanova), or taken in cognate disciplines. Requests to transfer credits, take courses at GPPC-affiliated institutions, or take courses in cognate disciplines must be approved by the Director of Graduate Studies. All coursework must be completed before the student registers for preliminary exams. Students will not accumulate credits for the same class or seminar taken twice or more.

Culminating Events:
Dissertation Advising:
It is the student’s responsibility, in consultation with their primary advisor, to assemble three advisory committees. It is best to form a committee that gives the student a variety of sympathetic but critical perspectives on the project. Three distinct committees, which are largely composed of the same members, must be in place at different phases of the proposal and dissertation processes. The committee guidelines are outlined below:

1. Proposal Advisory Committee: This committee guides the student through the preparation and defense of their dissertation proposal. The Proposal Advisory Committee is composed of three Graduate Faculty members from the Philosophy Department. One member is named Chair. Additional members from outside the Philosophy Department may be included with written approval from the Chair and the Graduate School. Normally, the Proposal Advisory Committee becomes the Doctoral Advisory Committee upon approval of the proposal.
2. Doctoral Advisory Committee: This committee guides the student through all stages of the dissertation. The Doctoral Advisory Committee must be in compliance with University guidelines as prescribed by the Graduate School. The committee must be composed of at least three Temple University Graduate Faculty members, two of whom must be from the Philosophy Department. A member of the committee from the Philosophy Department is named Chair.
   If changes must be made in the Doctoral Advisory Committee after the student is elevated to candidacy, such changes must be approved by the Chair of the Advisory Committee and the Graduate School. A "Request for Change in Dissertation Committee" form, found in TUportal under the Tools tab within "University Forms," must be filed.
3. Dissertation Examining Committee: This committee consists of the Doctoral Advisory Committee plus one Graduate Faculty member from outside Temple’s Philosophy Department OR one Outside Examiner. The Outside Examiner may be from another academic institution; should not have been a part of the dissertation writing process or the Doctoral Advisory Committee; and must be approved at least two weeks prior to the defense. The Chair of the Dissertation Examining Committee must be a member of the Temple University Graduate Faculty, but may not be the Chair of the student’s Doctoral Advisory Committee. The Chair of the Dissertation Examining Committee must be identified when the defense is posted through the Graduate School.

Preliminary Examinations:
The preliminary examinations consist of writing original research papers in:

1. History of Philosophy, defined as Ancient Philosophy through the end of the 19th Century; and 
2. Contemporary Philosophy, emphasizing constructivist, analytical or other philosophical approaches to a particular issue.

Students may submit either the historical or the contemporary paper first. These papers are typically developed from a student's best coursework papers and are generally revised through consultation with the professors who originally evaluated them. The papers should aspire to meet the standards of publication. NOTE: A successful course paper typically requires considerable work to become a successful preliminary paper. Preliminary examination essays should show both a mastery of relevant primary and secondary literature and put forward ideas that are an original contribution to the field. Graduate students are strongly encouraged to consult with faculty several months before their preliminary examination essays are due.

The first Preliminary Examination Paper is due by 4:00 p.m. on the second Monday in October at the beginning of the student's second year, and the second paper submission is due by 4:00 p.m. on the second Monday in October at the beginning of the student's third year. Papers must be prepared for blind review and submitted via e-mail to the Graduate Coordinator. Papers should include an abstract of not more than 200 words.

All papers are prepared for blind review and evaluated by three faculty members. Papers are graded High Pass, Pass, or Fail. In order to pass, papers must receive at least two grades of Pass (or higher). Papers that receive a Fail and a Pass, or two Fail grades automatically fail. Students get a second chance on each of the preliminary papers, but students who fail a preliminary examination twice are dismissed from the program. Second-year students who fail a preliminary examination resubmit, along with their second preliminary examination, in the October of their third year. Third-year students who fail a preliminary examination for the first time resubmit by 4:00 p.m. on the second Monday of the following February.

Students must be registered for at least one credit of PHIL 9994 Preliminary Examination Preparation in the terms in which they submit their preliminary examinations. Students who are required to resubmit their preliminary examinations must re-register for one credit hour of PHIL 9994 in the term in which the exam is to be resubmitted.

Dissertation Proposal:
The dissertation proposal is an opportunity for the student to develop and clearly articulate the project of the dissertation. The dissertation proposal has two components: written and oral. The written component should be 15-20 pages in length and include a statement of the problem, a critical literature review, and a sketch of how the student intends to address the philosophical problem(s) at hand. The student needs to make clear how the dissertation will be an original contribution to the field of philosophy. A detailed bibliography and chapter outline are also expected. The approved dissertation proposal serves as a contract between the student and their Doctoral Advisory Committee: the student agrees to complete the work outlined in the proposal under the guidance of the Doctoral Advisory Committee.

When the written component of the proposal is judged ready by the Proposal Advisory Committee, an oral examination date is set. At least two weeks before this examination, the defense is announced to the department faculty and at least two copies of the written proposal are made available in the Graduate Coordinator’s office.

The oral examination, which is conducted by the Proposal Advisory Committee, constitutes an opportunity for the student’s committee to make positive suggestions as well as to test the candidate’s preparedness. Other faculty may attend the oral examination and ask questions after the Proposal Advisory Committee has completed its questioning. The Proposal Advisory Committee decides, by majority vote, whether the candidate passes or fails the written and oral parts of the dissertation proposal.

Dissertation:
The dissertation should constitute a definitive and original contribution to the field of philosophy. It needs to show mastery of the relevant philosophical literature. The dissertation can be written as a monograph on a research topic or as, at least, three interrelated papers displaying specialization in a given field. The doctoral student should decide in consultation with their advisor and their dissertation committee which format would be most appropriate given their research topic. The dissertation should be in the hands of the Dissertation Examining Committee by October 1 for December graduation and by March 1 for May graduation.

All PhD students must formally and publicly defend their dissertations before the Dissertation Examining Committee. The candidate must submit the official, signed notice of the oral defense to the Graduate School 10 or more working days before the scheduled defense. A defense cannot be held without written confirmation of approval and receipt of the defense paperwork from the Graduate School.

The defense should be announced publicly and is open to all members of the University. During the defense, primary questioning is restricted to the members of the Dissertation Examining Committee. Then, Philosophy Department faculty members who have submitted written questions in advance may address the candidate. Lastly, other members of the Philosophy Department faculty may address the candidate. The Dissertation Examining Committee decides, by majority vote, whether the candidate passes or fails.