Temple Flag

Academic Planning Work Group
Charges and Membership

Common Charges to all Work Groups:

  • Work groups should work intensely during January and February 2008 and submit their recommendations to the Steering Committee by March 1, 2008.

All work group leaders must work with the Thread Leaders to ensure that the following issues are adequately discussed and considered:

    • Diversity (Roland Williams, College of Liberal Arts)
    • Technology (Robert Aiken, College of Science & Technology)
    • Ethics (Joan Shapiro, College of Education)
    • Balance of central versus de-centralized control
  • Work Groups should utilize knowledge gained from reports of previous task forces as appropriate (e.g., Faculty Senate Committee on Community Based Learning, Sustainability Task Force).

 

GROUP 1: Developing the Academic Community

Name School/College/Unit

Nadine Martin
Leader

College of Health Professions

Robert Stroker
Leader

Boyer College of Music and Dance

Beth Bailey

College of Liberal Arts

Pamela Barnett

Teaching and Learning Center

Beth Bolton

Boyer College of Music and Dance

Eric Borguet

College of Science & Technology

Ainsley Carry

Student Affairs

Rachel Clark-Vetri

School of Pharmacy

Jane Evans

Tyler School of Art

Hawley Fogg-Davis

College of Liberal Arts

Novella Keith

College of Education

Muriel Morisey

Beasley School of Law

Joanne Orth

School of Medicine

Samuel Spadone

School of Podiatric Medicine

David Watt

College of Liberal Arts

Roland Williams

College of Liberal Arts

Focus:  Strategies, investments, organizational arrangements necessary to preserve and enhance the academic and intellectual life of Temple University in research, scholarship, and creative activities; within and across disciplinary boundaries develop strategies for recruiting and retaining a new generation of world class faculty.

Task 1:  Define what is special and unique about the academic community of scholars at Temple University.  Identify the current set of issues that Temple must address as it seeks to strengthen the university as a community of scholars and learners.

Task 2:  By way of example, propose two to three strategic initiatives/investments that would directly enhance the recruitment and retention of faculty.

Task 3:  By way of example, suggest two strategic initiatives/investments that would enhance research, educational and/or creative collaborations within and across disciplines. 

Task 4:  Following the completion of Tasks 1 through 3, consider the metrics that Temple should use to track progress in this area once the Strategic Plan is finalized.

Task 5:  Consider how Work Group 1 might interface with the other Work Groups established as part of the strategic planning process.

return to top



GROUP 2:  Strengthening the Infrastructure for Research and Education

Name School/College/Unit

Hai-Lung Dai
Leader

College of Science & Technology

Larry Lemanski
Leader

Research and Strategic Initiatives

Larry Alford

University Libraries

Shohreh Amini

College of Science & Technology

Michel Boufadel

College of Engineering

Ron Brown

Colllege of Health Professions

Frank Campbell

Executive Office of the President

Richard Coico

School of Medicine

Cheryl Dileo

Boyer College of Music and Dance

Ken Geller

Research & Strategic Initiatives

Don Gill

School of Medicine

Steven Kelsen

School of Medicine

Jacqueline Leonard

College of Education

Sandy McDade

Office of the Deputy Provost

Zein-Eddine Meziani

College of Science & Technology

Timothy O'Rourke

Computer and Information Services

Robert Raffa

School of Pharmacy

Ron Taylor

College of Liberal Arts

Diane Woodruff-Pak

College of Liberal Arts

Focus: Strategies, investments, and organizational arrangements necessary to support expanded strength in research and educational programs in the physical, computational, natural, clinical and social sciences and in the arts and humanities; making Temple a world class environment for faculty and students.

Task 1:  Define the challenges and issues that must be addressed if Temple is to strengthen its research and educational infrastructure in the context of the breadth of the disciplines.

Task 2:  By way of example, suggest three to five strategic initiatives/investments that would enhance the research and educational enterprise at Temple.

Task 3:  Define the organizational arrangements that would support strengthening the infrastructure for research and education.

Task 4:  Define strategies for better integrating research and learning opportunities at all educational levels.

Task 5:  Upon completion of tasks 1 through 4, consider the metrics that Temple should use to track progress in this area once the Strategic Plan is finalized.

Task 6:  Consider how Work Group 2 might interface with the other Work Groups established as part of the strategic planning process.

return to top



GROUP 3:  Temple as a Destination Campus


Name School/College/Unit

Melissa Coopersmith
Leader

Executive Office of the President

Hester Stinnett
Leader

Tyler School of Art

David Bartelt

College of Liberal Arts

Lindsay Bremner

Tyler School of Art

Z. Joan Delalic

College of Engineering

Fran Dunphy

Athletics - Men's Basketball

Adelaide Ferguson

International Programs

Betsy Winter Hall

University Communications

T.L. Hill

Fox School of Business & Management

Ruth Hirshey

Alumna

Pauline Hurley-Kurtz

Ambler College

Luke Kahlich

Boyer College of Music and Dance

George Palladino

College of Science & Technology

Michael Scales

Student Affairs

Sheri Stahler

Computer and Information Services

Doug Wager

School of Communications and Theater

Kimmika Williams-Witherspoon

School of Communications and Theater

Steve Young

Recreation Services

Focus:  Strategies, investments and organizational arrangements necessary to enhance Temple University as a “Destination Campus.” This Work Group should consider this question from both the internal and external perspectives (e.g., what would attract world class students and faculty to Temple and what can Temple do to integrate itself within the cultural, civic and business communities of Philadelphia).

Task 1:  Provide a concise definition of what is special/unique about Temple’s environment and culture that can make it a “Destination Campus.”

Task 2:  By way of example suggest three to five strategic initiatives, beginning with physical investments and including complementary programming and amenities, that would that would directly enhance Temple University as a destination campus for students, faculty, staff, alumni and visitors (local, regional and global).

Task 3:  Define the organizational arrangements that would best support Temple’s commitment to being a “Destination Campus.”

Task 4:  Having completed tasks 1 through 3, consider metrics that Temple should use to track progress in this area once the Strategic Plan is finalized.

Task 5:  Consider how Work Group 3 can interface with the other Work Groups established as part of the strategic planning process.

return to top



GROUP 4:  Globalizing Temple


Name School/College/Unit

Teresa Soufas
Leader

College of Liberal Arts

Concetta Stewart
Leader

School of Communications and Theater

Bob Aiken

College of Science & Technology

Bill Aaronson

Fox School of Business &Management

Denise Connerty

International Programs

Adelaide Ferguson

International Programs

Zebulon Kendrick

Graduate School

Jayanthi Krishnan

Fox School of Business & Management

Keith Morrison

Tyler School of Art

Emeka Nwadiora

School of Social Administration

Arvind Phatak

Fox School of Business & Management

Monserrat Piera

College of Liberal Arts

Donnalyn Pompper

School of Communications and Theater

Wes Roehl

School of Tourism & Hospitality Mgmt

Eduard Schmieder

Boyer College of Music and Dance

James Shellenberger

Beasley School of Law

Focus:  Strategies, investments and organizational arrangements necessary to preserve and strengthen Temple’s current commitment to global engagement at all levels.  This work group should include development of campuses and programs overseas; linking Temple to an emerging network of international universities; and helping to lead the transformation of Philadelphia and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as major contributors to a global society.

Task 1:  Provide working definitions for “Globalizing Temple” and “global impact” taking into consideration the fact that Temple already has a global presence and that, Philadelphia and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania are important global regions.

Task 2:  By way of example suggest two to three strategic initiatives/investments that Temple might make in the next two years to extend its global impact.

Task 3:  Define the organizational arrangements that would best lead to a focused strategy that supports those units and individuals engaged in extending Temple’s global impact. As part of this definitional process, delineate a set of criteria and a process for establishing/selecting University-wide initiatives that would promote global impact.

Task4:  Following completion of Tasks 1 through 3, consider metrics that Temple should use to track progress in this area once the Strategic Plan is finalized.

Task 5:  Consider how Work Group 4 can interface with the other Work Groups established as part of the strategic planning process.

return to top



GROUP 5:   Building Temple’s Entrepreneurial Culture


Name School/College/Unit

John Daly
Leader

School of Medicine

Moshe Porat
Leader

Fox School of Business & Management

Dana Barron

Institute for Public Affairs

Peter Doukas

School of Pharmacy

Doina Ganea

School of Medicine

Antonio Giordano

College of Science & Technology

Jennifer Gordon

School of Medicine

Steve Houser

School of Medicine

Nick Kripal

Tyler School of Art

Cynthia Kuper

Alumna

Betsy Leebron

School of Communications and Theater

Zoran Obrodovic

College of Science & Technology

Arvind Parkhe

Fox School of Business & Management

Bill Parshall

Temple University Center City

Keya Sadeghipour

College of Engineering

Rickie Sanders

College of Liberal Arts

William Wilkinson

Office of the Provost

Monica Zimmerman

Fox School of Business & Management

Focus:  Strategies, investments and organizational arrangements necessary to encourage new endeavors, new academic programs, new pedagogies, and greater risk taking in general.

Task 1:  Identify the sets of challenges that Temple must face as it seeks to encourage innovative and entrepreneurial approaches to academic programs, new pedagogies and other entrepreneurial activities.  This Work Group should take into consideration the breadth of activities and disciplines represented at Temple so as to not limit its vision of entrepreneurialism to a single type of activity (i.e., tech transfer).

Task 2:  By way of example, suggest three to five strategic initiatives/investments to encourage and strengthen the entrepreneurial culture at Temple.

Task 3:  Describe the organizational arrangements that would best support Temple’s commitment to building its entrepreneurial culture.

Task 4:  Following the completion of Tasks 1 through 3, consider the metrics Temple should use to track progress in this area once the Strategic Plan is finalized.

Task 5:  Consider how Work Group 5 can interface with the other Work Groups established as part of the strategic planning process.

return to top



GROUP 6:  Enabling Temple as an Urban-Serving University


Name School/College/Unit

Carolyn Adams
Leader

College of Liberal Arts

Fred Murphy
Leader

Fox School of Business & Management

John Bennett

Disability Services

William Bergman

Campus Operations

John DiMino

Tuttleman Counseling Services

Barbara Ferman

College of Liberal Arts

Julie Fesenmaier

School of Tourism & Hospitality Mgmt

Frank Friedman

College of Science & Technology

Robert Gage

Research and Strategic Initiatives

Amy Goldberg

School of Medicine

Terry Halbert

Fox School of Business & Management

Laurinda Harman

Colllege of Health Professions

Deborah Howe

Ambler College

John Mattiacci

School of Podiatric Medicine

Linda Mauro

School of Social Administration

Kent McGuire

College of Education

B. Pepon Osorio

Tyler School of Art

Paul Swann        School of Communications and Theater

Scott Rutledge

School of Social Administration

Roy Stevens

Kornberg School of Dentistry

Stuart Sullivan

Institutional Advancement

Andrea Swan

Executive Office of the President

Ellen Tedaldi

School of Medicine

Focus:  Strategies, investments and organizational arrangements necessary to preserve and strengthen Temple’s mutually beneficial partnerships with its immediate community, apply knowledge generated at Temple to serve its immediate community and region, and to fulfill its obligation to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as a state-related institution.

Task 1:  Define what is special/unique about Temple’s engagement with its immediate community.  In performing this task Work Group 6 should consider how Temple’s commitment to community engagement integrates student learning, research, and service/outreach. It should also draw upon the Faculty Senate Committee on Community-based Learning and the Temple Community Programs Inventory Workgroup, as appropriate.

Task 2:  By way of example, propose three to five strategic initiatives/investments that would directly enhance Temple as an Urban-Serving University.

Task 3:  Define the organizational arrangements that would best support Temple’s commitment to community-engagement at all levels.

Task 4:  Following the completion of Tasks 1 through 3, consider the metrics Temple should use to track progress in this area once the Strategic Plan is finalized.

Task 5:  Consider how Work Group 6 can interface with the other Work Groups established as part of the strategic planning process.

return to top



GROUP 7:  Defining Temple’s Student Profiles for the Future


Name School/College/Unit

Richard Englert
Leader

Office of the Deputy Provost

Robert Reinstein
Leader

Beasley School of Law

Diana Breslin-Knudsen

Fox School of Business & Management

James Earl Davis

College of Education

Jim Degnan

Measurement and Research Center

Marylou Delizia

Fort Washington Center

Eli Goldblatt

College of Liberal Arts

Omar Hijab

College of Science & Technology

Peter Jones

Vice Provost for Undergraduate Studies

Robin Kolodny

College of Liberal Arts

Karin West Mormando

Enrollment Management

Mary Myers

Ambler College

Ruth Ost

Honors Program

Bret Perkins

Alumnus

Ruby Singh

College of Science & Technology

Roberta Sloan

School of Communications and Theater

Maurice Wright

Boyer College of Music and Dance

Focus:  Strategies, investments and organizational arrangements to answer such questions as: who should Temple teach; what types of students should be recruited and retained in an increasingly competitive market; how will Temple position itself in the national and regional market; how and where should students be enrolled; the role of international students; how students should be supported financially; what strategies will Temple adopt to better serve an adult population.

Task 1:  This Work Group should be divided into subgroups. One subgroup will focus on the 18-24 yr old undergraduate student body; a second subgroup will focus on the continuing education, degree completion adult market. Each subgroup should define its student populations taking into account the larger Temple academic community, and task force reports such as the report of the Ambler Task Force.

Task 2:  By way of example, each subgroup should suggest two to three strategic initiatives/investments that would directly enhance Temple’s ability to attract and retain its desired student body as defined in Task 1.

Task 3:  Define the organizational arrangements that would best support attracting and retaining Temple’s future students.

Task 4:  Define criteria by which undergraduate students should be admitted to Temple and by which they should be evaluated once enrolled at Temple.

Task 5:  Following completion of Tasks 1 through 4, consider the metrics Temple should use to track progress in this area once the Strategic Plan is finalized.

Task 6:  Consider how Work Group 7 can interface with the other Work Groups established as part of the strategic planning process.

return to top



GROUP 8:  Strengthening the Environment for Student Success


Name School/College/Unit

Jim Hilty
Leader

Ambler College

Theresa Powell
Leader

Student Affairs

Lynne Andersson

Fox School of Business & Mgmt

Marena Ariffin

Alumni Relations

Jim Chen

College of Engineering

Arthur Chodoroff

Boyer College of Music and Dance

Chris Dennis

Vice Provost for Undergraduate Studies

Scott Gratson

School of Communications &Theater

Laura Gruen

Alumni Relations

Patricia Hansell

College of Liberal Arts

Amy Hecht

Student Affairs

Aquiles Iglesias

Graduate School

Jodi Laufgraben

Office of the Deputy Provost

Robert Sanders

College of Science & Technology

Karen Sofranko

Vice Provost for Undergraduate Studies

Eric Stephenson

Temple Student Government

Ron Tuma

School of Medicine

Christine Woyshner

College of Education

Focus:  Strategies, investments and organizational arrangements to preserve and enhance curricular and co-curricular support for students with the aim of better preparing students for both their personal and professional lives after leaving Temple University.  This focus includes enhancing Temple’s capacity to successfully educate students from a range of economic, cultural, racial and educational backgrounds; and improving the mentoring and support students receive as they transition through Temple.

Task 1:  Define the current set of issues that Temple must address as it seeks to strengthen its community of students in preparation for personal and professional life challenges.  In performing this task the committee should consider Temple’s mix of residential and commuter students; the importance of mental health and personal growth in addition to professional preparation and the role of co-curricular activities in the pedagogy and learning environment at Temple.

Task 2:  By way of example, suggest three to five strategic initiatives/investments that would directly strengthen the environment for student success at all levels (undergraduate through professional/graduate school).

Task 3:  Define the organizational arrangements that would best support Temple’s commitment to strengthening the environment for student success.

Task 4:  Following the completion of Tasks 1 through 3, consider the metrics Temple should use to track progress in this area once the Strategic Plan is finalized.

Task 5:  Consider how the work of Group 8 might interface with the other Work Groups established as part of the strategic planning process.

return to top



GROUP 9:  Enabling the Bureaucracy to Serve the Academic Mission


Name School/College/Unit

Renee Hobbs
Leader

School of Communications and Theater

Laura Toran
Leader

College of Science & Technology

Michael Dorn

College of Education

Mary Anne Gaffney

Fox School of Business &Management

Sarah Gray

Kornberg School of Dentistry

Deborah Hartnett

Human Resources

Robert Hedley

School of Communications and Theater

Alex Holzman

Temple University Press

Moya Kinnealey

Colllege of Health Professions

Carol Lang

University Libraries

George Moore

University Counsel

Jo-Anna Moore

Tyler School of Art

Jackie Resavage

Academic Records

Ira Shapiro

School of Tourism & Hospitality Mgmt

Karen Turner

School of Communications and Theater

David Zanis

School of Social Administration

Focus:  Examining the processes, procedures and organizational arrangements that will support Temple’s evolving academic missions.

Task 1:  Describe a set of criteria whereby processes/procedures can be judged with regard to their support of these academic missions.

Task 2:  By way of example, suggest two university processes that could be enhanced or modified through application of the criteria described in Task 1, to better serve the academic mission.

Task 3:  Following completion of Tasks 1 and 2, consider the metrics Temple should use to track progress in this area once the Strategic Plan is finalized.

Task 4:  Consider how the work of Group 9 might interface with the other Work Groups established as part of the strategic planning process.

 

return to top





Academic Planning Home