![]()
![]()
Q&A with Dr. Peter
Doukas, dean of
the Temple University School of Pharmacy
Focus on the Future
![]() |
|
Gathered
around Dean Peter Doukas are the future of pharmacy. From left: Navneet
Bassi, first year; Shawn Spencer, graduate student; Doukas; Gina Scott,
second year; Manuel Espinosa, first year; Dainius Didzbalis, second
year; and Sakinah Purnell, second year. |
![]()
|
What
is the current role of pharmacists? Until
recently, pharmacists were charged primarily with the lawful
distribution of drugs, highly potent
chemicals that require professional oversight. This important
responsibility in isolation, however, fails to take full and proper
advantage of the medication-related expertise pharmacists can contribute
to patient care. The patient orientation of the profession continues to
grow with the national transition to the Pharm.D. as the sole
entry-level degree. Pharmacists are the health professionals most
accessible to the public, interacting on a daily basis with more
patients than any other health practitioner. The managed care
environment, with its emphasis on cost containment, continues to place
increasing numbers of patients with complicated health problems in an
ambulatory setting, with the expectation that sophisticated drug therapy
will diminish the need for hospitalizations. Simultaneously, physicians
are expected to serve larger numbers of patients within a tighter time
frame. Current health care relies heavily on a “team approach” to
patient treatment, wherein the pharmacist serves as the drug expert. Where
do you see the field of Pharmacy going in the future? The
provision of what is now being called “pharmacist care” complements
the role of physicians and provides a
means for improving patient compliance with a therapeutic
regimen, helping to ensure better outcomes. This is an increasing
trend that is responding to the growing number of literature citations
documenting the positive contributions of pharmacist cognitive services
to the quality of patient care while simultaneously promoting cost
savings. We will see more complicated therapies derived from the
biotechnology revolution, coupled with an aging population. The number
of annual prescriptions will soar to well over four billion within five
years. My expectation is that the pharmacies that you see currently will
change in some measure to become local clinical data gathering sites as
well. In addition to providing your prescriptions, there
may be certain device-based clinical tests that will be performed right
there at the pharmacy. The data will then be transmitted directly to the
physician. You’re probably going to see more and more patient care
partnerships between pharmacists and physicians in which there’s rapid
exchange of information concerning monitoring and care of the patient. What
is the current role of pharmacists? What opportunities will exist for current
and future graduates of TUSP? Graduates
have a broad array of opportunities in professional and corporate
settings, and this is reflected in specific elective tracks within our
program that permit differentiation of the degree. Our initiatives with
the pharmaceutical industry, the FDA, the Institute for Safe Medication
Practices, the Fox School of Business and our new Center for
Pharmaceutical Health Services Research enrich the intellectual
environment in which students seek to develop their potential. Our
educational program will continually evolve to reflect changes in the
field and will be especially influenced by developments in the industry. You’ve
mentioned that drug therapy is going to change drastically in years to
come. Can you explain
that further? The
technological ability to collect, transmit and analyze large amounts of
data will provide the basis for population-based therapeutic models.
This same data analysis capability, coupled with completion of the human
genome project, will bring about more individualized therapies. The hope
is that certain therapies will become tailored more exactly to what a
patient needs. Many of the new drugs will require novel delivery
systems. It’s really an entirely different way of approaching the
issue. Is
there a single aspect of what students now learn that you think will be
radically different in the future? Perhaps something that doesn’t
even exist today? Yes,
absolutely: the drugs themselves. We’re going to be shifting to a
whole new set of drugs that will be the knowledge that has come from the
genome. Seventy percent of the drugs that we have today weren’t around
just 30 years ago. There are currently about 100
or so relatively small biotechnology companies in existence, each
seeking to exploit the knowledge of the genome to produce unique,
efficacious therapies. It
seems like with the changes to come, there will be no limit as to the
number of new drugs that will be created. That’s
true. The drugs that we’ve been dealing with up until now have roughly
500 molecular targets. With the genome project, the number of targets
will increase to about 10,000. That’s a 20-fold increase in the number
of potential targets that you’re looking to influence in treating
certain problems or diseases. There’s going to be a tremendous
increase in the number of compounds that will require professional
oversight. As
it stands now, the only real way we have to individualize a drug is
through dosage levels, correct? Will we be combining two or more drugs
to treat specific diseases or conditions? In
fact, we routinely use drug combinations now. Not in all cases, but in
certain disease states in the future we’re going to take into account
the particular genetic library that a patient has. What do I mean by
that? You can target particular genes for particular diseases, but you
also have issues of drug metabolism. Certain people either have an
excess or a relative lack of metabolizing enzymes for eliminating drugs.
You’ll be better able to target the drug to the person’s own system
from the standpoint of his or her ability to
metabolize the compound. Do
you think the pharmacist who now works behind a counter dispensing drugs
will even exist in the future? For
solid dosage forms — powders and capsules — robotics will take care
of the dispensing, similar to what you see currently in many hospital
pharmacies. For most liquids, we’ll probably also be able to come up
with a way to dispense from a large machine. Technicians will oversee
the robotics, but you’re still going to need the pharmacist to educate
the patient and to be in control of these highly potent materials. There
has been a trend for several years now for drugs to become available
over the counter much
more quickly than in years past. Do you see this continuing? Yes.
It will continue for a variety of reasons that are mostly economic.
Nevertheless, it can be a dangerous practice since these materials are
quite powerful. Pharmacists will need to better educate patients about
drugs that they purchase over the counter, as well as
about prescriptions. Pharmacists should, for safety reasons, be involved
in educating patients about all of the medications they take. If
you had to describe the ideal job for a future practicing pharmacist,
how would you do it? The
scenario of the pharmacist partnering in a therapeutic relationship with
the physician and patient is certainly
the clinical ideal. That is what will ensure the best quality of life
and health for the patient and the full and efficient use of our human
and material resources. What
changes do you think the Temple University School of Pharmacy will
undergo in years to come? We will get even better at maximizing our resources and our professional relationships with our medical colleagues, the industry and the FDA and will continue to provide an excellent intellectual environment for students, faculty and staff. |
Reprinted from Connection, Spring 2001