Techno Brief

Mid-Atlantic Regional Technology in Education Consortium  
1301 Cecil B. Moore Ave.
Ritter Annex 9th Floor
Temple University - CRHDE
Philadelphia, PA 19122

800-892-5550
215-204-5130 (fax)

General Inquires:
Laurence Peters
Johann Sarmiento
Judith Stull  
Technical Assistance:
Barry Mansfield  
Professional Development:
Joan Pasternak

Temple University Temple University Center for Research in Human Development and Education


The fourth consideration is the accessibility of the product. Will the product be accessible to all students including those with disabilities?
  1. Can a student navigate through the product by using only a keyboard (without the use of a mouse)?
  2. Does the software or online resource recognize personal operating system settings? (e.g., color, contrast)
  3. Does the software or online resource provide multiple means of communicating content?
  4. Is the software or online resource compatible with screen readers?
  5. Does the software or online resource use blinking or animated images?

The next consideration deals with infrastructure requirements. MAR*TEC recommends that educators consider the following:

  1. Does the software or online resource require the purchase of new hardware or software or the upgrade of old systems?
  2. Is the software or online resource stand-alone, network-based or web-based?
  3. What is the total cost of ownership per year?
 

Finally, MAR*TEC recommends that educators consider the support and service needs of the technology-based instructional product.

  1. Is the software easy for teachers and students to use?
  2. What professional development will be needed?
  3. How often do you need to upgrade the software? At what cost?

The answers to these questions cannot come from any one educator. Consideration of instructional software and online resources requires input from educators in different roles such as classroom teachers, special education teachers, technology coordinators, technical support staff, and purchasing representatives. MAR*TEC recommends convening a review team of experienced educators with a range of teaching and technical experience. Before independently evaluating software or online products, the team must participate in a norming session to collectively consider one or two pieces of software. The team can then individually consider instructional pieces but should correlate their data into a collective analysis.

Integration of instructional software and online resources is vital to the academic achievement of all students. However, teachers should not make purchasing decisions in isolation. Successful technology integration requires systemic purchasing policies and ongoing collaboration among all of the major “players” in the educational community.

References

Rose, D. & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for
        learning . Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Soloway, E. (1998). No one is making money in educational software. Communication of the
        ACM, 41
(2), 11–15.

U.S. Department of Education (2002). The facts about. . .investing in what works Retrieved
        August 2003, from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/methods/whatworks/whatworks.html

U.S. Department of Education (2002). Scientifically based research. Retrieved August 2003,
        from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/methods/whatworks/research/index.html

Previous     Page 1 2  3 4 


Copyright 2001 © MARTEC