Techno Brief

Mid-Atlantic Regional Technology in Education Consortium  
1301 Cecil B. Moore Ave.
Ritter Annex 9th Floor
Temple University - CRHDE
Philadelphia, PA 19122

800-892-5550
215-204-5130 (fax)

General Inquires:
Laurence Peters
Johann Sarmiento
Judith Stull  
Technical Assistance:
Barry Mansfield  
Professional Development:
Joan Pasternak

Temple University Temple University Center for Research in Human Development and Education

 

6.  Software should provide textual information for conveying text content, text input, caret location, and text attributes. Operating systems often use text to convey to assistive technology devices what the software is doing and where it is being done. If a software program does not offer this information in text form, students who use assistive technology devices may not be able to use the program.
7.   Programs should not override student's preset contrast and color selections and other individual display attributes. Visually impaired students often rely on color and contrast to make the onscreen images comprehensible. Many educational software titles use animation to appeal to younger students, but animation may constitute a barrier for visually impaired students if the program overrides preset color and contrast settings.
8.    If animation is used, the information being conveyed should be represented in at least one nonanimated form and should be synchronized to the onscreen activities. Without narration or text, a student who is blind cannot access onscreen information.
9.     Color-coding alone should not be used to indicate an operation, convey information, or designate the status of an operation or control. A student who is colorblind or otherwise visually impaired needs an alternate form of identification such as text, narration, or icons. A typical example of a color barrier is the use of green to indicate "yes" and red to indicate "no." Colors can be used but must be accompanied by the text to explain what the code represents.

 


10.   If software permits the student to adjust color and contrast settings, a wide variety of shades and colors should be offered. Some students with visual impairments or sensitivities find it necessary to alter the color and contrast of images on screen to make the onscreen information decipherable.
11.   Software should not use flashing or blinking text or objects that have a flash frequency greater than 2Hz and lower than 55Hz. This standard is important because some students have photosensitive epilepsy and can have epileptic seizures triggered by flashing light, images, or icons. If flashing or blinking images are used, the software's product information should be consulted or the manufacturer should be contacted to insure that the frequency is within an acceptable range.
12.   Software that includes electronic forms within the program should allow students to complete the form by using assistive technology. Input fields, directions, and cues should be accessible to screen readers and or Braille devices.

These 12 standards are minimum requirements for the overall accessibility of programs. When previewing programs, it may be helpful to keep in mind particular disabilities. For instance, a student who is deaf may be able to make use of software that would otherwise be completely inaccessible to a student who is blind. Overall, the concepts used to develop these standards may be useful for both disabled and nondisabled students, because the standards make the software accessible, reinforce skills, and reduce the overall physical strain of using an application over a long period of time.

Conclusion
As more educators integrate technology into the classroom, the Section 508 standards that are set forth in the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, will become an integral part of the purchasing and curriculum development process. Although guidelines for educational software accessibility are not currently mandated in the law, schools can use these guidelines as a model to provide equitable access to all. By incorporating these regulations into that process, students with disabilities who would otherwise be segregated from the modern classroom can enjoy inclusion, while students without disabilities can benefit from superior products.

Previous     Page 1 2 3 Next


Copyright 2001 © MARTEC