![]() | |
| A digest of research from the Laboratory for Student Success |
No. 301 |
|
The National Commission on Excellence in Education, in its 1983 report, A Nation at Risk, emphasized the dismal state of academic competence among American high school graduates. The Commission's report attributed the situation directly to a curriculum comprised of an abundance of survey courses and few courses with challenging content. The Commission recommended minimal requirements for high school graduation consisting of 4 years of English; 3 years of mathematics, science, and social studies; and one-half year of computer science. Two years of foreign language were recommended for college-bound students. Following publication of this report, many states, districts, and schools revised their requirements in the direction of its specifications. Despite these changes, many schools still do not require the
recommended amount of course work. Only 49% of high schools require 3
years of mathematics, and only about 28% of schools require 3 years of
science (Finn, 1998). Further, among 1994 high school graduates, only 13%
completed the full set of courses recommended by the Commission, and
almost one-half of graduates did not complete the recommended course work
in English, mathematics, science, and social studies alone.
The universality of the relationship between course work and proficiency has been underscored in the literature in several ways. Research has shown that the relationship of mathematics performance with the number of courses taken is essentially the same for all demographic groups. Sebring (1987), for example, found that, while the impact of course taking differed between states and across subject areas (social studies, foreign languages, physical science, and mathematics), the relationship was consistently positive. The extent of advanced course work in a subject area may be more important than the total amount of course work. A 1995 analysis of science and mathematics data from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (Williams, Atash, & Chaney, 1995) revealed that the strongest effects were for courses taken beyond the basic requirements. Similar conclusions have been drawn by other researchers. Factors That Shape Programs of Study The dynamics that underlie students'choices are complex. The courses students take reflect personal preferences as well as contextual factors, including offerings that are available and practices and policies that determine student access. The configuration of courses available in a school delimits the courses students can take and thus what they learn. The curriculum can be comprised largely of "basic" or "survey" courses or, alternatively, can include a substantial number of advanced courses. Findings from the recently completed Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) indicate that, on the whole, our curricula in these fields cover more topics but are less intensive than those of other countries; the typical American curriculum is described as "a mile wide and an inch deep" (Schmidt, McKnight, & Raizen, 1996, p. 34). Some courses play a special role as "gatekeepers." A student who takes algebra in eighth grade can readily take a full mathematics curriculum in high school. However, a recent government report indicated that only 25% of U.S. eighth graders were enrolled in algebra, with even smaller percentages among low-income and minority students. Advanced courses and gatekeeper courses are not equally available in all schools or to all groups of students. At the middle school level, Epstein and MacIver (1992) found that Catholic schools offer basic science and reading courses to more students and advanced courses and electives such as algebra and foreign languages to fewer students than do other schools. Through a survey of 1,200 public and private school teachers that focused on the racial/ethnic and socioeconomic composition of schools, Oakes (1990) found that, "As the proportion of low-income and minority students at a school increases, the relative proportion of college-preparatory and advanced course sections decreases" (p. 35). Calculus, a "gatekeeper" course, lies at the extreme. The number of sections (per pupil) in "high-wealth" schools was approximately 4 times that of "high-poverty" schools, even after eliminating over 50% of high-poverty schools that offered no calculus course at all. Even a school with extensive course offerings may engage in practices that deny access to some groups of students. Graduation requirements are associated with course taking generally. Increased requirements, however, have an impact on introductory courses and benefit less able students in particular. Williams et al. (1995) identified schools whose requirements in each subject were "high" relative to state requirements, and, conversely, those that were "low." As expected, more courses were taken, on average, in high-requirement schools. The study also showed that more low-ability students enroll in science and mathematics courses in high-requirement schools. No practice distinguishes the opportunities available to groups of
students as definitively as the creation of academic tracks. Tracking (the
assignment of students to a group that will be exposed to a particular
curriculum) is "so much a part of how instruction is organized in
secondary schools...that we seldom question it" (Oakes, 1985, p. 6). While
the curriculum within a track is not the same for all students,
differences among tracks are more significant. Students in higher tracks
are exposed to more content, to more advanced content, and to more
challenging content than students in lower tracks; students in lower
tracks are denied access to this material (Oakes, 1990). Unfortunately,
students are locked into lower tracks by mechanisms that make mobility all
but impossible. Three practices encourage engagement in course taking by some groups of
students while discouraging it in others. The decisions to offer advanced
course work in particular disciplines and in graduation requirements work
in tandem. First, requirements assure engagement in basic course
taking for most or all students (Goodlad's "equity"). Second, advanced
offerings make it possible for students to attain excellence
(Goodlad's "quality"). Unfortunately, a third practice-tracking-can
partially or wholly subvert these goals by creating groups of students for
whom exposure to academic course work is minimal. Finn, J. D. (1998, April). Course taking in high school: Mathematics and foreign languages. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. Goodlad, J. (1984). A place called school. New York: McGraw Hill. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Oakes, J. (1990). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corp. Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., & Raizen, S. A. (1996). A splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Sebring, P. A. (1987). Consequences of differential amounts of high school coursework: Will the new graduation requirements help? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9, 258-273. Williams, T., Atash, N., & Chaney, B. (1995, April). Legislating
achievement: Graduation requirements, course taking, and achievement in
mathematics and science. Paper presented at the meeting of the
American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
| |
| Spotlight on Student Success is an occasional series of articles highlighting findings from the Laboratory for Student Success (LSS) that have significant implications for improving the academic success of students in the mid-Atlantic region. For more information on LSS and other LSS publications, contact the Laboratory for Student Success, 9th Floor, Ritter Annex, 13th Street and Cecil B. Moore Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19122; telephone: (215) 204-3000; E-mail: < LSS@vm.temple.edu>. |