|
| |
| A digest of research from the Laboratory for Student Success |
No. 209 |
|
Changes in education should be grounded in a knowledge base derived from research; such a base is now emerging. By analyzing the content of 179 handbook chapters and reviews, compiling 91 research syntheses, and surveying 61 educational researchers, the authors of this study compiled a knowledge base comprised of 11,000 statistical findings that shows consensus on the most significant influences on student learning. The results of the research analysis were summarized using a 28-category conceptual framework based on models of schooling that posited influences on learning. To better understand which influences were most important, the 28 categories were grouped into six broad types of influences: student characteristics; classroom instruction and climate; home, peer, and community context; program design; school organization; and state and district characteristics. The 28 categories of the conceptual framework are listed in this Spotlight, along with a representative variable for each category. By combining the results from the content analysis, the research synthesis, and the survey of experts, an average score was obtained for each of the 28 categories. This score represents the degree of influence of each category. In general, direct influences were found to have a greater impact on learning than indirect influences. Direct influences, for example, include the amount of time a teacher spends on a topic and the quality of the social interactions teachers have with their students. Examples of indirect influences include policies adopted by a school, district, or state and organizational features such as site-based management. The estimates obtained on the effectiveness of various educational strategies for improving student learning provide a set of considerations for formulating educational policies and practices as well as a way to identify school improvement priorities. Overall, findings show renewed emphasis on psychological, instructional, and contextual influences. Paradoxically, the state, district, and school policies that have received the most attention in recent years appear to have the least influence on learning. Because indirect influences may only affect direct influences, they appear to be weaker and less consistent in their results. For example, implementing a districtwide policy for teacher evaluation does not guarantee that students in any given classroom will have a competent teacher. Unless reorganizing and restructuring strongly affect direct influences on learning, they offer little hope of substantial improvement Changing policies is unlikely to change practices in classrooms and homes, where much of learning actually takes place. Better alignment of remote policies and district practices and more direct intervention in the psychological determinants of leaned promise the most effective avenues of reform. Twenty-Eight Categories of Influence on School Learning Student Characteristics includes gender, academic history, and a variety of social, behavioral, motivational, cognitive, and affective characteristics.
Comprehension monitoring (planning, monitoring effectiveness of and outcomes of actions; testing, revising, and evaluating strategies) 2. Cognitive Processes Level of specific academic knowledge in subject area instructed 3. Social and Behavioral Attributes Positive, nondisruptive behavior 4. Motivational and Affective Attributes Attitude toward subject matter instructed 5. Psychomotor Skills Psychomotor skills specific to area 6. Student Demographics Socioeconomic status
Group alerting (teacher uses questioning/recitation strategies that maintain active student participation) 8. Student and Teacher Social Interactions Student responds positively during interactions with teachers and other students 9. Quantity of Instruction Time on task (amount of time students are actively engaged in learning) 10. Classroom Climate Cohesiveness (class members are friends, share common interests and values, and emphasize cooperative goals) 11. Student and Teacher Academic Interactions Frequent calls for extended, substantive oral and written response (not one-word answers) 12. Classroom Assessment Use of assessment as a frequent, integral component of instruction 13. Classroom Instruction Use of clear and organized direct instruction 14. Classroom Implementation and Support Establishing efficient classroom routines and communicating rules and procedures 15. Home Environment and Parental Support
Instructional materials employ advance organizers 20. Program Demographics Size of instructional group (whole class, small group, one-on-one instruction) 21. Curriculum and Instruction Alignment among goals, content, instruction, student assignments, and evaluation
School wide emphasis on and recognition of academic achievement 23. Teacher/Administrator Decision Making Principal actively concerned with instructional program 24. Parental Involvement Policy Parental involvement in improvement and operation of instructional programs 25. School Demographies Size of school 26. School Policies Explicit school wide discipline policy
Teacher licensure requirements 28. District Demographics School district size
| |
| Spotlight on Student Success is an occasional series of articles highlighting findings from the Laboratory for Student Success (LSS) that have significant implications for improving the academic success of students in the mid-Atlantic region. For more information on LSS and other LSS publications, contact the Laboratory for Student Success, 9th Floor, Ritter Annex, 13th Street and Cecil B. Moore Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19122; telephone: (215) 204-3000; E-mail: <LSS@vm.temple.edu>. |